[3] 《四國宣言》全文見《中華民國外交史料匯編》(十二)，第5931-5932頁。
[4] 同上，第5934-5935頁。
[5] 同上，第6007頁。
[6] Memoranda by the Chinese Government (Cairo, November 24, 1943)， United
States Departmentof State / Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers,
Government Printing Office, 1961) p.387.The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran,
1943 (1943)， (DC:
[7] 美國外交檔案"開羅會議"卷收錄的Hopkins Paper在11月23日條下記載提到了蔣對蘇聯對華態度十分關心，其中特別提及中共問題、新疆問題、外蒙獨立問題等。
United States Department of State/ Foreign relations of the United States
diplomatic papers,Government Printing Office, 1961) p.376.The Conferences
at Cairo and Tehran, 1943 (1943)， (DC:
[8] 如《解放軍報》2007年12月24日刊登題為《蔣介石兩次拒接收琉球》的文章；《環球時報》2009年3月1日還刊登了在網上廣泛流傳的題為《釣魚島禍根：二戰後蔣介石兩拒琉球回歸》的文章，等等。
[9] CHIANG KAI-SHEK, An Inventory of His Diaries in the Hoover Institution
Archives, 43-10(November , 1943)，11月3日。
[10] 《中華民國外交史料匯編》(十二)，第6015頁。
[11] CHIANG KAI-SHEK, An Inventory of His Diaries in the Hoover Institution
Archives, 43-10(November , 1943)，11月15日。
[12] 同上，43-10(11月17日)。
[13] 同上，43-10(11月17日)。此處黑體字是作者所加。
[14] United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United
States diplomatic papers,Government Printing Office, 1961) p.349350.
The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943(1943)， (DC:
[15] Ibid. p.366-367.
[16] 在《國防最高委員會秘書廳呈蔣委員長關於準備在開羅會議中提出之戰時軍事合作、戰時政治合作及戰後中美經濟合作等三種方案》(民國三十二年十一月，原件日期不詳)中，在“關於休戰及議和條款”下的丙條也明確說“收複一八九四年以來日本所取得及侵占之領土”。《中華民國外交史料匯編》(十二)，第6022頁。
[17] CHIANG KAI-SHEK, An Inventory of His Diaries in the Hoover Institution
Archives, 43-10(November , 1943) , Prepared by Lisa H. Nguyen, Hoover Institution,
Stanford University, 2006, updated 2007, 2008，43-10(11月25日)。
[18]國立編譯館(主編)：《中華民國外交史料匯編》(12)， 第6072頁。
[19]據歷史學家的研究，1624年後，“在藩奉行”並未獲得在琉球的決策權，其功能僅限於監督琉球王府交納年貢等。因此，日本以此證明自己早就獲得了對琉球的統治權也沒有根據。
[20] United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United
States diplomatic papers,Government Printing Office, 1961) p. 322323.
The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943(1943)， (DC:
[21] 英國外交部檔案，371、35755, 《西藏與中國的宗主權問題》，1943年4月10日，轉引自梅.戈爾斯坦：《喇嘛王國的覆滅》，杜永彬譯，北京：中國藏學出版社，2005, 第325頁。
[22] 《中華民國外交史料匯編》(十二)，第6016-6017頁。
[23] 羅伯特.達萊克：《羅斯福與美國對外政策》，陳啟迪等譯，北京：商務印書館，1984, 第612, 474, 556頁。關於美國與英國在對華關係及亞洲殖民地問題上的差異，參見王建朗：《從蔣介石日記看抗戰後期的中英美關係》，《民國檔案》2008年第4期。
[24] 《中華民國外交史料匯編》(十二)，第6021-6022頁。
[25] 例如，英國曾對於“東北四省、台灣等歸還中國”以及“使朝鮮獨立”等措辭表示反對，主張改為“當然必須由日本放棄”及“脫離日本之統治”就可以，原因是英國擔心這些提法會引起其亞洲殖民地的聯想。同上，第6064頁。
[26] 同上，第6035頁。
[27] CHIANG KAI-SHEK, An Inventory of His Diaries in the Hoover
Institution Archives, 43-10(November , 1943) ,此條記在開羅會議(1943年11月22日-26日)
之後的反省錄中。 Prepared by Lisa H. Nguyen, Hoover Institution,
Stanford University, 2006,updated 2007, 2008.
[28]國立編譯館(主編)：《中華民國外交史料匯編》(12)，第6060頁。這裡提及國體與“民族的精神構造”的關係，又比較“同為東方人的中國人”在國體問題上與“西方人”的差異，證明不同的世界秩序觀在對待戰後秩序的安排上起著一定的作用，值得注意。
[29] 英文原文(譯文)："The president then referred to the question of Ryukyu islands
and enquired more than once whether China want the Ryukyu. The Generalissimo replied
that China would be agreeable to joint occupation of the Ryukyu by China
and America and , eventually, joint administration by the two countries under
the trusteeship of an international organization." United States Department of
State / Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers,
Government Printing Office, 1961)， p. 324.The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran,
1943 (1943)， (DC:
[30] 英文原文(譯文)："President Roosevelt proposed that, after the war, China and
the United States should effect certain arrangement under which two countries
could come to each other's assistance in the event of foreign aggression and that
the United States should maintain adequate military forces on various bases in the
Pacific in order that it could effectively share the responsibility of preventing
aggression. Generalissimo expressed his agreementto both proposals. The Generalissimo
expressed his hope that the United States would be in a position to extend a necessary
aid to China for equip its land, naval and air forces for the purpose of strengthening
its national defense and enabling its performance of international obligations.
Generalissimo Chiang also proposed that, to achieve mutual security, the two countries
should arrange for army and naval bases of each to be available for use by the other
and stated that China would be prepared to place Lushun (port of Arthur) at the joint
disposal of China and the United States. President Roosevelt, on his part,proposed
that China and the United States should consult each other before any decision
was to be reached on the matter concerning Asia. The Generalissimo indicated agreement。
"Ibid. p. 324.
[31] 圖瓦人居住在薩彥嶺和唐努山之間的區域，清代稱為“唐努烏梁海”，系烏裡雅蘇台將軍下轄的專區，地位與同屬的科布多和喀爾喀蒙古四部相並列。1914年被俄國武力侵占，十月革命後，1921年8月中旬，圖瓦呼拉爾(All-Tuva Constituent Khural)宣布建立唐努-圖瓦共和國(Tannu-Tuva Ulus Republic)，並通過第一部憲法。開羅會議後一年，即1944年，唐奴-圖瓦被蘇聯單方面吞並。
[32] United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States
diplomaticpapers,Government Printing Office, 1961)， p. 324325.The Conferences at
Cairo and Tehran, 1943 (1943)， (DC:
[33] 盧溝橋事件前，中蘇已經簽訂互不侵犯協定及交換意見，並於"八一三"戰爭後簽訂了《中蘇互不侵犯條約》。但1940年蘇方認為中國"在國際聯盟會上對於削除蘇聯 會藉一案，圍場積極相助"而冷淡；1941年因皖南事變蘇聯對蔣施加壓力；同年，蘇聯與日本簽訂中立條約，表示尊重滿洲國、外蒙人民共和國等。在新疆問題上，蘇聯早期(1933-34)入侵哈密，擁盛世才而逐馬仲英，但至四十年代，盛世才與蘇聯產生矛盾；就在開羅會議前五個月蘇聯撤回其在新疆的飛行隊，地質考察團，拆毀飛機製造廠，調回技工人員等等。因此，開羅會議之前，中蘇關係處於挫折期。見《中華民國外交史料檔案》(十二)，第5818頁。
[34] 英文原文："We are determined that the islands in the Pacific which have
been occupied by the Japanese,many of them made powerful bases contrary to
Japan's specific and definite pledge not to militarize them, will be taken
from Japan forever. The territory that Japan has so treacherously stolen
from the Chinese, such as Manchuria and Formosa, will of course be returned to
the Republic of China. All of the conquered territory taken by violence and
greed by the Japanese will be freed from their clutches". United States
Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States diplomatic papers,
Government Printing Office, 1961)，p.403. 下面提及的英方草案打印稿見
同上文件第404頁。The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943 (1943)， (DC:
[35] 《中華民國外交史料檔案匯編》(十二)，第6004-6005頁。
（來源：人文與社會網） |
